Temperature-driven developmental modulation of yield response to nitrogen in wheat and maize

High nitrogen supply may be positive, neutral, or negative for yield
under high temperature.
N management
Temperature
Critical period
Grain number
Wheat
Maize

Victor O. Sadras, Nicolas Giordano, Adrian A. Correndo, C. Mariano Cossani, Juan M. Ferreyra, Octavio P. Caviglia, Jeffrey A. Coulter, Ignacio A. Ciampitti and Romulo P. Lollato, “Temperature-driven developmental modulation of yield response to nitrogen in wheat and maize,” Frontiers in Agronomy Vol 4 (2022): 903340. doi: 10.3389/fagro.2022.903340

Authors
Affiliations
Victor O. Sadras

South Australian Research and Development Institute, The University of Adelaide

Nicolas Giordano

Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University

Adrian A. Correndo

Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University

C. Mariano Cossani

South Australian Research and Development Institute, The University of Adelaide

Juan M. Ferreyra

INTA, Argentina

Octavio P. Caviglia

Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos / CONICET, Argentina

Jeffrey A. Coulter

Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota

Ignacio A. Ciampitti

Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University

Romulo P. Lollato

Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University

Published

June 2022

Doi

Abstract

Nitrogen management is central to the economic and environmental dimensions of agricultural sustainability. Yield response to nitrogen fertilisation results from multiple interacting factors. Theoretical frameworks are lagging for the interaction between nitrogen and air temperature, the focus of this study. We analyse the relation between yield response to nitrogen fertiliser and air temperature in the critical period of yield formation for spring wheat in Australia, winter wheat in the US, and maize in both the US and Argentina. Our framework assumes (i) yield response to nitrogen fertiliser is primarily related to grain number per m², (ii) grain number is a function of three traits: the duration of the critical period, growth rate during the critical period, and reproductive allocation, and (iii) all three traits vary non-linearly with temperature. We show that “high” nitrogen supply may be positive, neutral, or negative for yield under “high” temperature, depending on the part of the response curve captured experimentally. The relationship between yield response to nitrogen and mean temperature in the critical period was strong in wheat and weak in maize. Negative associations for both spring wheat in Australia and winter wheat with low initial soil nitrogen (< 20 kg N ha⁻¹) in the US highlight the dominant influence of a shorter critical period with higher temperature; with high initial soil nitrogen (> 120 kg N ha⁻¹) that favoured grain number and compromised grain fill, the relation between yield response to nitrogen and temperature was positive for winter wheat. The framework is particularly insightful where data did not match predictions; a non-linear function integrating development, carbon assimilation and reproductive partitioning bounded the pooled data for maize in the US and Argentina, where water regime, previous crop, and soil nitrogen overrode the effect of temperature on yield response to nitrogen fertilisation.

Citation

 Add to Zotero

@article{SadrasEtAl:2022,
    Author = {Victor O. Sadras and Nicolas Giordano and Adrian A. Correndo and C. Mariano Cossani and Juan M. Ferreyra and Octavio P. Caviglia and Jeffrey A. Coulter and Ignacio A. Ciampitti and Romulo P. Lollato},
    Doi = {10.3389/fagro.2022.903340},
    Journal = {Frontiers in Agronomy},
    Number = {903340},
    Title = {Temperature-driven developmental modulation of yield response to nitrogen in wheat and maize},
    Volume = {4},
    Year = {2022}}